Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Independent Party (Ireland)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National Independent Party (Ireland)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This tagged for WP:GNG in May by Guliolopez. A group that failed to organise enough to register or contest under a banner does not reach notability enough. Mere mentions of it considering registration as are referenced here should not be sufficient coverage to maintain the page here. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Ireland. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom, the topic/org doesn't meet WP:NORG or WP:SIGCOV. In honesty the article was created far WP:TOOSOON (originating just 2 weeks after the party's formal launch. 14 Jan 2014 > 29 Jan 2014. And ahead of any material [non-launch/non-primary] coverage). I was barely able to scrabble together a small number of sources to establish even the basics (existence/creation/etc) and no sources to establish anything beyond that (not even finding sources to confirm continued existence or disestablishment). While, in honesty, I'd like to be able to recommend redirection (as an WP:ATD), I can't fathom where a redirect would "go". (As neither of the associated people are notable enough for a standalone article and the pre-existing "former parties" section of the related list article was [for reasons I'm not sure I understand or agree with] replaced with a navbox template...) Guliolopez (talk) 18:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Spleodrach (talk) 19:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet WP:NORG or WP:SIGCOV. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom - did a quick check just now, as this was only a vague "heard of on the radio topic" and just don't find backing to reach minimum policy requirements (ORG, GNG, VER, SIGCOV, etc.). It existed, then it probably didn't... Like another nomination today, could probably be captured in a "minor parties in Ireland" type article, perhaps a table in a List article, but no such thing exists now, and what minimal data there is can be found again should such a list be created. SeoR (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This was a minor blip that amounted to nothing and did nothing notable or important. Most people were unaware of its existence. Spideog (talk) 21:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.